PDA

View Full Version : Patriarch of Terror; Catholic patriach praises Jihad against Israel


Perun
01-13-2005, 12:26 AM
Now this is something you dont hear about everyday!

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=16525

Patriarch of Terror
By Joseph D'Hippolito
FrontPageMagazine.com | January 4, 2005


Christmastime in Bethlehem does not stand for ”peace on earth” but for intensified jihad against the occupying Jews, as least according to the highest-ranking Roman Catholic prelate in the Holy Land.

Michel Sabbah, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, has praised jihad, justified suicide bombing, and led marches at the behest of the late Yasser Arafat – leading some to question whose bidding the patriarch is doing.



Sabbah, an Arab and a native of Nazareth, expressed his collaborationist sympathies most forcefully during a visit to a refugee camp near Bethlehem in 1999. During that visit, the patriarch placed a wreath on a memorial to so-called “martyrs.” He then maintained that the right of return is “an existing fact that cannot be given up,” and declared that Israel’s “extracting our rights in all circumstances is a form of jihad” against the Palestinians.



However, he has not always objected to holy war. “Love is power and jihad and does not express weakness,” he told the newspaper Al-Quds.



Sabbah goes further by excusing suicide bombing as a legitimate response to Israeli policy. Sabbah said in a 2002 videotape to Palestinian Christians:



Ours is an occupied country, which explains why people are tired and blow themselves up. The Israelis tell Palestinians: Stop the violence and you will have what you want without violence. But one has seen in the history of the last ten years that the Israelis have moved only when forced by violence. Unfortunately, nothing but violence makes people march. And not only here. Every country has been born in blood.



Sabbah's service to Yasser Arafat’s terrorists extends beyond words. On New Year's Eve 2002, the patriarch led a “peace” march toward one of the Israeli checkpoints. Only about 200 people – most of them Italian pilgrims – joined Sabbah. A Franciscan priest named Father Ibrahim explained to Italian journalist Massimo Toschi from Missioni Oggi (the monthly published by the Xaverian missionaries) why the march attracted so few people. “He says that...the patriarch organized the march at Fatah's request and that this was a mistake,” Toschi wrote, “because the next time the request will come from Hamas and the patriarch won't be able to say no.” The Fatah organization, which Arafat founded in 1959, is dedicated to creating a Palestinian state by destroying Israel. Patriarch Sabbah literally follows their marching orders.



Sabbah has worked with a variety of other Palestinian terrorists, as well. In 2000, Sabbah met with Arafat in Gaza as an act of “Christian solidarity with the Palestinian leadership,” according to a press release from the patriarch's office. The release's author took great pains to mention by name the Christians in Arafat's inner circle – including George Nabash, founder of the Marxist-oriented Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.



Sabbah’s anti-Semitism is deep and overt, as evidenced by his remarks toward Arafat during Christmas Mass in 1995. In welcoming Arafat, the patriarch “was happy to recall” how Byzantine Patriarch Sophronius tried to persuade Muslim Caliph Umar Ibn al-Khattab to prohibit Jews from living and worshipping in Jerusalem after conquering it in 636 – eight years after Sophronius instigated a widespread massacre of Jews. “In the end,” Sabbah once said, “we will send them away just as we did to the Crusaders.”



Indeed, he seemed to call for the full-scale demolition of the Jewish state during a proclamation at the 2000 Christmas Mass: “This is our land, to claim our freedom, among our demolished houses and in our besieged towns and villages.”



The patriarch engaged in a worldwide PR effort for terrorists during the seven-week stalemate between Palestinian gunmen and the Israeli army at Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity in 2002 – although his testimony was contradicted by others in his church. When gunmen invaded the church and began their seven-week occupation on April 1, Sabbah “immediately declared that the entering Palestinians were not armed, were willingly accepted into the Church by the friars, and given asylum,” Sergio Minerbi wrote for the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.



Two days later, Franciscans, who serve as Catholic custodians of holy sites, refuted the patriarch. Spokesman David Jaeger, a Franciscan priest, wrote that the ensuing Israeli siege resulted from “the violent invasion affected by armed men who thereafter barricaded themselves there.” Jaeger also told the Israeli daily Ha'aretz that “when the battle started, the doors of the Basilica were closed. Armed Palestinians fired at the locks, entered the Basilica, and barricaded themselves in the compound.”



While diminishing the Israelis' concerns about terrorism, Sabbah accentuates Palestinian victimization. Commenting on the situation at the Church of the Nativity on May 8, 2002, Sabbah stated, “As the cause of all violence is the Israeli military occupation of the Palestinian lands, once the occupation is ended, violence will cease.” During Easter Mass that year, he stated “Injustice and oppression have been imposed on only one of the two peoples,” adding that Israeli leaders “must stop talking about terrorism to hide the root evil and to justify and feed the permanence of death and hatred.”



Such rhetoric has won the Palestinian patriarch a number of leftist admirers in the United States. Since 1999, Sabbah has been president of Pax Christi International, a Roman Catholic organization that advocates radical pacifism. Though Sabbah's views might seem to disqualify him from leading such an organization, they fit Pax Christi's underlying philosophy of excusing Palestinian murder. Sabbah's told the Pax Christi USA's 2003 national assembly:



With the start of the second intifada or Palestinian resistance, under the guise of dismantling the infrastructure of Palestinian terrorism, Israeli forces have systematically destroyed almost every political and civil Palestinian institution over the last twelve months. Not only have President Arafat's government and security services been decimated, banks and businesses, schools and research centers, town halls, media outlets, the land registry and the courts have been violated or destroyed. A peaceful future cannot be shaped in this way.



It is the civilian population, in the Occupied Palestinian Territories and as well as in Israel, that is the victim of this never-ending spiral of violence, of unjust military occupation and of the current political and economic crisis.



Sabbah regularly exploits his Christmas messages for his political purposes. In 2001, when Israeli authorities prohibited Arafat from attending Midnight Mass in Bethlehem, Sabbah's pro-Arafat propaganda became effusive during his sermon: “The dignity of President Arafat is the dignity of all of us. The occupation situation is unfair to the Palestinians and they have to have their freedom. This is the meaning of Christmas (emphasis added).” So much for Baby Jesus.



In 2002, when the Israelis again kept Arafat from going to Bethlehem, Sabbah used his Christmas sermon to address the Israeli people more melodramatically: “Blood has been flowing in your cities and streets, but the key to solving this conflict is in your [Israeli] hands. By your actions so far, you have crushed the Palestinian people, but you still have not achieved peace.” The patriarch also praised the absent Arafat: “We wish you were with us tonight, and we call on God to give you the wisdom and the power under this siege to continue your mission toward peace and justice.”



In his Christmas 2003 sermon, Sabbah criticized the security fence that helps separate Bethlehem from the rest of the West Bank, and called Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip the conflict's “basic evil.”



“The sacrifices of these years will not be for nothing if those responsible conclude the true results, rather than concluding that building the wall is the true solution,” the patriarch said. “The true results are that war destroys people and places and does not silence a people that demands its freedom.”



Last year, Sabbah reiterated that theme. “Bethlehem should be a free city,” he said on December 21. “The Israeli authorities resumed the work to complete the wall, which makes Bethlehem a big prison. Ending the oppression and the humiliation of the Palestinians would at the same time put an end to the fear and insecurity of the Israelis.”



That same day, Sabbah declared that Palestinians have “adopted plans for peace” and that “Israeli leaders are invited to do likewise by putting an end to their military interventions and by stopping construction of the wall, as well as the hunt for the wanted.”



Those comments echo ones made that day by Mahmood Abbas (a.k.a. Abu Mazen), who replaced Arafat as the Palestine Liberation Organization's chairman: “We are standing here today to reiterate to the world that we are committed to the choice of just peace, to achieve the rights of our people.” Israelis, however, remember that their troubles have never stemmed from an unwillingness to negotiate.



Sabbah's activism overshadows his pastoral responsibilities and destroyed his credibility with Palestinian Christians. “It's surprising that Bethlehem’s Catholics are not behind the patriarch,” Toschi wrote in describing the New Year's Eve 2002 peace march. “There's talk about the divisions present even between the Catholic churches and there's consensus on the idea of the necessity of the Latin patriarch being more autonomous with respect to political positions.” Italian journalist Sandro Magister, who has covered the Vatican for more than 25 years, wrote in L'Espresso that Sabbah is “isolated ... even within the Palestinian Catholic community. Isolated because he is partisan; excessively aligned with the extremist currents that throw their weight around in Bethlehem and the territories.”



In 2003, Pope John Paul II delivered a subtle vote of no confidence in Sabbah's pastoral stewardship by appointing Jean-Baptiste Courion – a convert from Judaism – as auxiliary bishop responsible for Hebrew-speaking Catholics. But as the worldwide clerical sex-abuse crisis demonstrates, this pope feels reluctant to discipline malfeasant bishops more forcefully.



Moreover, subtlety might be lost on an activist prelate who has made collaboration with genocidal totalitarians a way of life.

starr
01-13-2005, 04:00 AM
Sabbah, an Arab and a native of Nazareth, expressed his collaborationist sympathies most forcefully during a visit to a refugee camp near Bethlehem in 1999. During that visit, the patriarch placed a wreath on a memorial to so-called “martyrs.” He then maintained that the right of return is “an existing fact that cannot be given up,” and declared that Israel’s “extracting our rights in all circumstances is a form of jihad” against the Palestinians.


It seems all you ever hear about these days is the Christian fundamentalists and similar types that bow down to the jews and basically kiss their feet. But I suspect there are many like this, especially in this part of the world, and Palestinian Christians, in particular who have, through personal experience, a very different view of the "beloved" Jews. Too bad there aren't more like this, among our own people.

CONSTANTINVS MAXIMVS
01-13-2005, 08:07 AM
Bet keikel will really love Catholicism now. :p

otto_von_bismarck
01-13-2005, 08:16 AM
Bet keikel will really love Catholicism now. :p
Child molestors, socialists, and jihad asslickers.

Lets say Israel was jihaded out by some nutty Pali state, wtf is going to happen to all the palestinian christians then do you think.

Erzsébet Báthory
01-13-2005, 08:17 AM
Child molestors, socialists, and jihad asslickers. This is something that has puzzled me. What exactly is your real problem with Islam? Mainstream Muslim social views seem to line up with yours rather well.

otto_von_bismarck
01-13-2005, 08:19 AM
This is something that has puzzled me. What exactly is your real problem with Islam? Their social views seem to line up with yours rather well.
No not at all. Shariah and Taliban life has zero appeal to me.

Erzsébet Báthory
01-13-2005, 08:22 AM
No not at all. Shariah and Taliban life has zero appeal to me.The Taliban is a rather extreme version. I mean the more "moderate" Muslims. They often support "keeping women in their place," arranged marriage, anti-Catholicism, letting the rich be filthy rich, and other causes you seem to like.

otto_von_bismarck
01-13-2005, 08:24 AM
The Taliban is a rather extreme version. I mean the more "moderate" Muslims. They often support "keeping women in their place," arranged marriage, anti-Catholicism, letting the rich be filthy rich, and other causes you seem to like.
Yeah but if I want that I can support the Mormons and not get the baggage and the stupid homo veils.

Erzsébet Báthory
01-13-2005, 08:30 AM
Yeah but if I want that I can support the Mormons and not get the baggage and the stupid homo veils.LOL. You have a point.

starr
01-13-2005, 08:58 AM
Lets say Israel was jihaded out by some nutty Pali state, wtf is going to happen to all the palestinian christians then do you think.


I obviously don't know how much truth there is in this, but it is an article that relates to what you are asking about:


The Israeli policy of divide and conquer has not split Christian and Muslim Palestinians despite attempts to sow discord between the two communities.



According to Palestinian Christian leaders, Israeli military authorities have tried repeatedly to “foster an atmosphere of mistrust between the two communities”, for the purpose of eroding Palestinian national unity and crushing Palestinian aspirations for freedom and liberation.

Christians, though a minority, have always been an integral part of the Palestinian social, cultural and political fabric.

As Talal Sidr, a Hebron community leader and a religious affairs adviser to President Yasir Arafat, points out, the Christian community in Palestine predates Islam by several centuries.

“They were here first, this is a historical fact. They belong here as much as we do,” says Sidr.

United in conflict

Sidr reminds people that Palestinian Christians, like many Christians of the Near East, fought the “Franks” or Crusaders alongside their Muslim countrymen.


Muslims and Christians have both
suffered the pain of occupation


In modern times, especially since the Nakba or catastrophe in 1948, when the bulk of the Palestinian people were uprooted from their ancestral homeland in what is now Israel, Christians as well as Muslims suffered the agony of homelessness and exile.

Moreover, like other Palestinians, Christians have actively joined the national struggle against the Israeli occupation, with some occupying leading positions in the various factions of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO).

Christian figures as George Habash, Nayif Hawatmah, Edward Said, to mention a few, have loomed large in the web of Palestinian National struggle.

Today, Christian Palestinian figures such as Dr Hanan Ashrawi continue to speak eloquently in defence of the Palestinian national cause.

Moreover, Christian religious leaders such Archimandrite Ata Allah Hanna, spokesman of the Orthodox Patriarchy in Jerusalem, use every opportunity to condemn and expose the Israeli oppression, often inviting Israel's anger, pressure and occasionally threats of expulsion.

Common goal

Unlike other countries in the region, such as Lebanon, Palestinian Christians and Muslims have always acted as “one community rather than two sects”, according to Professor Hanna Issa, an expert on international law.

Issa, a Christian, says it is a taboo even to ask Palestinians if they are Muslim or Christian.

“We are one people; it is a timeless fraternity that proved itself throughout history”

Hanna Issa,
Professor of international law

“If you go to a Palestinian village where Muslims and Christians live and ask people in the street what religion they adhere to, they will look strangely at you.”

Issa does not like to ascribe the term “national unity” to Christian-Muslim relations in the West Bank.

“We're one people; it's a timeless fraternity that has proved itself throughout history.”

Issa does not seem to be exaggerating. In Bethlehem, the traditional birth place of Jesus, it would be difficult to distinguish between Muslims and Christians by appearance.

Interfaith celebrations

Moreover, many Muslims share with Christians their Christmas holiday and many Christians celebrate with Muslims the joy of occasions such Eid al-Fitr, marking the end of the fasting month of Ramadan.

Symbolically, the Mosque of Umar ibn al-Khattab (named after the second caliph or successor of the Prophet Muhammad) stands on the western side of the Manger Square, embracing the Church of the Nativity in a solemn harmony unseen and unfelt in many other lands.

“Here the mutual respect is neither superficial nor artificial. It comes from the heart and is the result of deep conviction,” says Hanna al-Bandak, a Christian shopkeeper.

In the villages of Beit Arik near Ram Allah, this harmony takes on a cordial partnership.

According to Hanna Issa, when the Muslim community at the village sought to build a larger mosque to accommodate the growing number of worshipers, Christians at the village insisted on “paying our share of the costs”.

Eventually, the two communities shared equally the costs of the new mosque, a testimony and example of inter-religious harmony.

Dwindling community

But against this rosy picture of Christian-Muslim harmony stands a community dwindling because of steady emigration to South and Central America, Australia and, increasingly, Sweden.


Worsening living conditions have
caused increased emigration


According to Bernard Sabella, Professor of Sociology at Bethlehem University, Christians in Palestine now make up less than 2% of the population. In 1893, Christians made up 13% of Palestinians.

Sabella says the trend toward emigration among indigenous Christians poses special challenges at a time when their skills, knowledge and perspective are needed in the efforts of state and institution building.

He calls on the Churches of Palestine to formulate a common strategy “to ensure that Palestinian Christians will not end up forming expatriate communities in such distant lands as Australia, Chile, USA, and Canada”.

“It is indeed sad when there are more Palestinian Christians from Jerusalem celebrating Easter in Sydney than in Jerusalem. This break-up spells the possible end of community life as it has been known and experienced in the Holy Land for countless generations.”

'No Muslim harassment'

According to Bishara Awad, dean of the Bible College in Bethlehem, Israeli persecution is “first and foremost” to blame for Christian (and Muslim) emigration.

“I have not seen any attack on our churches or institutions. We are like brothers here”

Bishara Awad,
dean of Bible College, Bethlehem

“We, Muslims and Christians alike, have been on the receiving end of oppression since 1967. The occupation is the root cause of economic deterioration. Some people can’t live under constant pressure for a long time; so they emigrate when they are no longer able or willing to withstand oppression.”

Awad denies Israeli allegations that many Christians leave because of harassment by Muslims.

“I haven't seen any attack on our churches or institutions. We're like brothers here. We share and attend each other’s social occasions. We're one people,” he told Aljazeera.net.

Education

Awad, whose five brothers emigrated, believes the key to stemming the tide of Christian emigration to the holy land lies in education. He cites recent statistics showing that young people with a university degree were less likely to emigrate.

“We noticed only 20% of college graduates showed an inclination to emigrate while as many as 80% of people with a high school diploma or below showed a desire to emigrate.”

Awad points out the Bethlehem and Beir Zeit Universities were playing a significant role in reducing Christian emigration.

“Most educated people don’t leave.”