http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=140484&page=1&pp=10

Let's do it.

Whether or not it's a good thing, try it and you end up in jail getting raped by Jamaicans.

Whether or not it's a good thing, try it and you end up in jail getting raped by Jamaicans.


So you are saying the government must be violently over thrown? :D

Whether or not it's a good thing, try it and you end up in jail getting raped by Jamaicans.


Seriously I doubt what you say. If there can be a Marijuana Party and a Marxist-Lenist Party, there can be a racialist party. Legal challenges against it wouldn't stand up in court.

yeah, but don't call it the 'racialist party'... something simple like Paul Fromm's 'Canada First Party' idea is the best way to go. Not that I think it'll be successful or anything, but it'd be interesting to watch things develop..

Seriously I doubt what you say. If there can be a Marijuana Party and a Marxist-Lenist Party, there can be a racialist party. Legal challenges against it wouldn't stand up in court.

Wasn't there a guy in Alberta a few months back who's house was invaded because they found him posting on Stormfront?

If the signators and leadership figures could be apart from the stereotypical internet WN scene, then it'd probably be alright.

yeah, but don't call it the 'racialist party'... something simple like Paul Fromm's 'Canada First Party' idea is the best way to go. Not that I think it'll be successful or anything, but it'd be interesting to watch things develop..

Well, if the country decides to separate, then whites will have someone to represent them. An alternative is the religious angle such as Cosmotheism.

Wasn't there a guy in Alberta a few months back who's house was invaded because they found him posting on Stormfront?

I don't know anything about it. If it's true though, he should be more fearless
given that they already know him and what he stands for.

If the signators and leadership figures could be apart from the stereotypical internet WN scene, then it'd probably be alright.

That would rule out Paul Fromm and myself. I don't think it's necessary. It would help if we had professional people in the party though, doctor, lawyer, accountant, etc. Leaders need to be open about their views and won't back down.

this is what I was thinking of: http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/05/14/canada/bahr040514

this is what I was thinking of: http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/05/14/canada/bahr040514

Wonder where he is now and what he's doing? Hope they didn't scare him.

The idea of spreading hate is interesting and should be explored philosopically. They talk about it like it's a virus or something. DON'T LOOK AT THAT SWASTIKA!! The HORROR, the HORROR!! You're gonna catch some hate. :rolleyes:

The idea of spreading hate is interesting and should be explored philosopically. They talk about it like it's a virus or something. DON'T LOOK AT THAT SWASTIKA!! The HORROR, the HORROR!! You're gonna catch some hate. :rolleyes:

LOL, if only it worked that way. ;)

Glen was interviewed on a radioshow a few days before the home invasion, and it was a complete embarassment for him and anyone else associated with him. If I can find a recording of it I'll post it here. He's a good example of someone I wouldn't want representing me.

I believe it's but a small minority of people who philosophically support this legal interpretation of 'hate'... but I really can't blame average people for interpreting this kind of thing simply as anti-hooliganry, rather than anti-free speech...

That must be the one my husband listened to. He said it was awful and the guy didn't have any of his **** together.

Truly awful.. it's kind of frustrating, all the people who turned their radios off after that, more sure than ever that these people are all a bunch of morons.

here it is: http://www.freedomsite.org/r-free/wcfu/WFCU_on_Warren_may2-04.wma

LOL, if only it worked that way. ;)


My point is it wouldn't hold up in an honest court. Tell me the truth, tell me lies, do what you can -- to make me hate accorn trees. If I don't really have a hatred inside me for accorn trees, nothing you say is going to make me hate them. If I read a book on serial killers, will I become one?

...up in an honest court.

Where do we find one of these?

1. Choose a subtle name.
2. Get some Aboriginals in, because they're a minority, they're the real natives, and whenever somebody calls you racist say something like "Then how come we got Johnny Two Bird here".
3. Hire a Jewish lawyer.

Where do we find one of these?


That is a good question. Who is to assure that the courts don't become corrupt?

1. Choose a subtle name.
2. Get some Aboriginals in, because they're a minority, they're the real natives, and whenever somebody calls you racist say something like "Then how come we got Johnny Two Bird here".
3. Hire a Jewish lawyer.

Indians want us out of here. I'm not even sure they can become part of a Federal party without losing their 1st nation status.

Every sane person is racist. Even a 5 year old child can tell a negro from a white person.

Never trust a jew.

so, what will you name it?

so, what will you name it?

That'll be up to Paul Fromm or whoever he is working with.

I wrote up a constitution for a political party but it is closely entwined with Cosmotheism. I called the party the ACT Party. ACT is an acronym for Ascension of Consciousness and Truth. Plus, I like how it implies acting (or doing) rather than just talking.