PDA

View Full Version : Bill calls for establishment of international court of anti-Semitic crimes


FadeTheButcher
07-26-2004, 10:40 PM
Criticize the Jews. That should be made criminal. Sick bastards.

http://www.maarivintl.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=printArticle&articleID=9487

MK Eliezer Cohen says court must be established in Israel to fill gap created by ICJ, which does not deal with anti-Semitism.

Arik Bender (contact@maariv.co.il?subject=Arik Bender)

National Union MK Eliezer Cohen tabled a proposed bill this (Tuesday) afternoon by which an international court of anti-Semitic crimes would be established in Israel.
According to Cohen, “The International Court of Justice in the Hague (ICJ) deals with all world needs but does not deal with the growing problem of anti-Semitism and crimes against Jews. Therefore such a court must be established in Israel to fill the gap”.

Cohen said that when the International War Crimes Court had been established, dealing with anti-Semites was not included in its objectives. “The hatred of Jews today, which is being promoted by wicked incitement, is no less than during past generations”, he said.

The bill states that from now on any extradition agreement Israel signs with another country would include an article of extraditing those who commit anti-Semitic crimes. The court would be authorized to try foreigners, organizations, companies and even foreign media bodies. Cohen suggests that the court would be able to fine or sentence convicted criminals to prison, and even to hand out death sentences to those who would be convicted of murdering Jews.

Ebusitanus
07-26-2004, 10:55 PM
This is pretty ****ed up!

otto_von_bismarck
07-26-2004, 11:06 PM
I oppose this, all international law sucks espec if it encompasses thoughtcrime.

SteamshipTime
07-27-2004, 01:27 AM
In all seriousness weikel, the jurisprudence of classical international law would appeal to you. Its bedrock principles are (or were) that international law only deals with relations between nation-states; nation-states are completely sovereign, even on the decision of whether to comply with an international tribunal's judgment; and jurisdiction is by the voluntary consent of the nation-states. This is why Nuremburg and its progeny are considered such farces by non-PC legal scholars.

CONSTANTINVS MAXIMVS
07-27-2004, 02:09 AM
I wonder which country would sign such a treaty, but I'm afraid I won't like the answer to this question.

AWAR
07-27-2004, 02:35 AM
Well, if they push it too far with this game, soon someone will
establish an international anti-semitic court. :)