I X A B E R T . N E T

The blog will be the main part of the website. The appearance of the forum will change dramatically within the next few days. I shall make up the rules as I go along—capriciously, one might say. My practical approach to thought-regulation is invariably liberal and tolerant; indeed, though I have no ethical objection to censorship in itself, in practice I never have the slightest desire to censor anyone. I shall permit others to exercise such rights within reason. As it stands, the only thing I forbid is the dissemination of pornographic material or any imagery that might repel the uninitiated (gore etc). A considerable number of people have expressed to me their intentions to contribute. But even if people don't end up posting there, it will still remain useful to me as a repository for articles. Its existence is thus guaranteed indefinitely. The registration process is free from the rigmarole of email verification. The only requirements for registration are username and password.—Ixabert

It is not the form of government or the particular political-economic framework in which the community happens to operate but the moral constitution of the contsituent members of society which ensures the felicity or misery of the public weal. Capitalism operates flawlessly if the owners of capital are of sound moral constitution. Democracy is perfect if the democratic majorities are of sound moral constitution. The same holds for communism, socialism, anarchism, liberalism, theocracy, dictatorship, monarchy, anarchy.—Ixabert

Men tottering about in trousers (those pitiful emblems of effeminacy) actually have a lower sperm count & testosterone level than their kilt-clad counterparts. I myself prefer tunics (in the Greek style) yet I'd cut the throat of any man who presumed to sully the reputation of so fine a garment—Ixabert.

Even left-wing intellectuals admit: “Ixabert…runs rings around much of the received wisdom spouted by people…A lot of people are afraid of Ixabert and his ideas. So they choose to denigrate him, and call his ideas ‘bizarre’. And yet Ixabert's arguments, no matter how counterintuitive, are invariably good.”—A Marxist-Gramscian academic who cited an article I wrote on Pol Pot in some Spanish encyclopædia.—Ixabert.

Bare feet is good if you never wear shoes. Its shoe wearers that have stinky feet. Not we who never wear them—Ixabert.