View Full Version : Thinking about women
What are these usually aesthetically pleasing creatures? Are they just men with vaginas? I've mused that sexually succeeding might come by treating them as such. What are women? (no semantics games please, women physically exist) Are men just women on steriods?
bardamu
07-17-2004, 03:48 AM
What are these usually aesthetically pleasing creatures? Are they just men with vaginas? I've mused that sexually succeeding might come by treating them as such. What are women? (no semantics games please, women physically exist) Are men just women on steriods?
I have asked myself the same question. But I have to doubt whether it is true that woman are "usually aesthetically pleasing". I think it is only maybe a tenth of them that are usually aesthetically pleasing. It is because of this disparity in numbers that the attractive ones have so much power.
I think it is only maybe a tenth of them that are usually aesthetically pleasing.
That low a figure?
Edana
10-19-2004, 03:37 AM
Only some women are just men with vaginas... a very very small number.
Carrigan
10-19-2004, 03:57 AM
I think it is only maybe a tenth of them that are usually aesthetically pleasing. It is because of this disparity in numbers that the attractive ones have so much power.
The following can also be said:
I think it is only maybe a hundredth of men that are usually aesthetically pleasing. Despite this disparity in numbers, it is the unattractive ones who have so much power.
You're working entirely within the framework of "women obtain power based solely on physical attractiveness, and that's the way it is" -- without for a moment considering WHY it is this way or why it is different for men. Way to think inside the box, Bardmau!
vBulletin v3.0.3, Copyright ©2000-2005, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.