PDA

View Full Version : Sex differences and intelligence


Ixabert
11-05-2004, 08:21 PM
Excerpts from an article (http://cms.psychologytoday.com/articles/index.php?term=PTO-20030624-000003) from Psychology Today.

. . . that females have about 15 to 20 percent more gray matter than males . . . [makes] sense of another major sex difference: Men, overall, have larger brains than women (their heads and bodies are larger) . . .

. . . White matter, made of the long arms of neurons encased in a protective film of fat, helps distribute processing throughout the brain. It gives males superiority at spatial reasoning. White matter also carries fibers that inhibit "information spread" in the cortex. That allows a single-mindedness that spatial problems require, especially difficult ones. The harder a spatial task, Gur finds, the more circumscribed the right-sided brain activation in males, but not in females. The white matter advantage of males, he believes, suppresses activation of areas that could interfere with work.

. . .

The difference between the sexes may boil down to this: dividing the tasks of processing experience. Male and female minds are innately drawn to different aspects of the world around them. And there's new evidence that testosterone may be calling some surprising shots

Women's perceptual skills are oriented to quick--call it intuitive--people reading. Females are gifted at detecting the feelings and thoughts of others, inferring intentions, absorbing contextual clues and responding in emotionally appropriate ways. They empathize. Tuned to others, they more readily see alternate sides of an argument. Such empathy fosters communication and primes females for attachment.

. . .

Men focus first on minute detail, and operate most easily with a certain detachment. They construct rules-based analyses of the natural world, inanimate objects and events. In the coinage of Cambridge University psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen, Ph.D., they systemize.

The superiority of males at spatial cognition and females' talent for language probably subserve the more basic difference of systemizing versus empathizing. The two mental styles manifest in the toys kids prefer (humanlike dolls versus mechanical trucks); verbal impatience in males (ordering rather than negotiating); and navigation (women personalize space by finding landmarks; men see a geometric system, taking directional cues in the layout of routes).


. . .

The brain basis of empathizing and systemizing is not well understood, although there seems to be a "social brain," nerve circuitry dedicated to person perception. Its key components lie on the left side of the brain, along with language centers generally more developed in females.

Baron-Cohen's work supports a view that neuroscientists have flirted with for years: Early in development, the male hormone testosterone slows the growth of the brain's left hemisphere and accelerates growth of the right.

Lack of eye contact and poor language aptitude are early hallmarks of autism. "Being strongly attracted to systems, together with a lack of empathy, may be the core characteristics of individuals on the autistic spectrum," says Baron-Cohen. "Maybe testosterone does more than affect spatial ability and language. Maybe it also affects social ability." And perhaps autism represents an "extreme form" of the male brain.

Nuclear Thoughts
11-05-2004, 08:31 PM
I read, some years ago, that the average white male has an IQ 4 points higher than the average white female.

Seems reasonable.

AntiYuppie
11-05-2004, 11:04 PM
According to Jensen, white males have a slightly higher average IQ (2-3 points) and a substantially higher variance (I don't remember the figures here). Higher male variance means that there will be more males in both the exceptionally brilliant and exceptionally stupid categories.

Carrigan
11-06-2004, 04:03 PM
Ixabert: This article refers to "norms" and "averages", correct? Surely it can't be asserting that all men and women fit perfectly into the described patterns.

It annoys me when, in this context, language like "men do this" and "women do that" is used. This makes it appear as if the arrogant assumption is being made that all men and women fall into the norms of their gender. Instead, language more like "men, in general. . ." and "most women . . ." should be used to convey that these sets of patterns and norms are not unbreakable.